Blog

We’re a few weeks out from Cannes 2024. 85 year old Francis Ford Coppola returns to the festival with his epic, self-financed, decades in the making Megalopolis.

So far the word on the street is that the movie is. . . .a mess. Stories of previews leaving potential studio buyers stunned and confused are making the rounds.

But there’s a deeper story here. Good or bad or somewhere in between or beyond the realm of description, Megalopolis represents the kind of risky director driven picture Hollywood would sometimes make in its past. But almost NEVER makes anymore.

And Coppola has had the epic instinct from…

It’s instructive when you see a movie you don’t get upon first screening but sense is profound.

Such is the case for this writer with Roberto Rossellini’s (and Federico Fellini’s co-scripted) THE FLOWERS OF ST. FRANCIS (1950, Italy).

The movie is based on two well-known 14th century Italian novels Fioretti di San Francesco (The Little Flowers of St. Francis) and La Vita di Frate Ginepro (The Life of Brother Juniper) which tell now popular folktales, parables, stories about the beloved humble Italian Christian monk Francis of Assissi and the fellow monks who followed him and likewise took vows of poverty and service to others.

Francis is known to many Christians as the Saint who loved nature, talked to animals as equals, and, like Buddha, gave up a life of wealth to…

Ezra Edelman’s 7 1/2 hour ESPN 30 x 30 doc O.J. Made In America is as one of a kind as the story it tells. Made as a television miniseries for ESPN’s superlative 30 x 30 documentary program, it screened at the Sundance Film Festival before it aired on television. It later went on to win the Best Feature Documentary Academy Award.

The documentary, save for a few bumps and the occasional over-reliance on drone shots of Los Angeles court buildings (the only time you are reminded of its television roots), is superlative. Its core strength comes from its determined commitment give all perspectives and viewpoints their due.

Edelman DOES have a point of view and a thesis. But he also has that rare gift: the ability to let the truth be the truth and speak for itself. And an understanding that…

Dear Secret Movie Clubbers: After our hiatus, we are back to movie writing and movie blogging. In fact, we want to work in 2024 to really be part of co-writing the next chapter in cinema culture with worthwhile movie writing.

If you have an interest in writing for Secret Movie Club, reach out to us at: community@secretmovieclub.com and we’ll go from there.

If you haven’t already, you can also follow us at SECRET MOVIE CLUB ON LETTERBOXED

So. . .for better or for worse. . .here is part 1 of a very long-form blog extravaganza collecting a number of the reviews we posted recently on LETTERBOXED about the key pop culture movies of 2023. We want to hear your thoughts! Feel free to comment.

And more to come.

POOR THINGS (2023)

One of the more fascinating aspects of POOR THINGS is how the production design (by Shona Heath and James Price) is a strangely apt visual metaphor for filmmaker Yorgos Lanthimos's directorial voice.

Lanthimos wanted…

Although one should only take this just so far, it is interesting how some director’s bodies of work can often be distilled to a single meta-story.

Almost all of Martin Scorsese’s movies tend to be about a very flawed central character looking for some kind of redemption who goes through hell and survives at the end.

And in Alfred Hitchcock' movies, the meta theme of an innocent person accused of a crime they didn’t commit and needing to clear their own name crops up in too many of his movies to be coincidence. The Lodger, The 39 Steps, The Lady Vanishes, Young and Innocent, Rebecca, Saboteur, Spellbound, Strangers on a Train, I Confess, The Wrong Man, North by Northwest, Frenzy all carry DNA of this plot.

Hitchcock was very self-aware of this and…

When Hitchcock made 1958’s Vertigo and 1959’s North by Northwest back to back, one could argue he was at the peak of his powers.

Between 1951 and 1963, Hitchcock directed 13 feature films, none of them bad or even mediocre, all of them good to all-time classic level AND shepherded a television show Alfred Hitchcock Presents among other endeavors (including vinyl albums, mystery books, etc) to great success.

This is the era where Hitchcock made himself an industry. And that’s not written disparagingly. In the brutal ever-changing climate of American movie making, Hitch was smart to become a household name. It allowed studios to view Hitchcock as bankable as the stars in the movie.

In a way, Hitchcock was finally reaping the fruits of 30+ years of hard labor: a Hitchcock movie or TV show was now a genre unto itself. And this gave Hitchcock greater power in choice of story, budget, creative control.

What’s fascinating here is that…

Somewhere along the way I developed a personal metric for those filmmakers I thought were all-timers. If they had made a reasonable amount of movies and five of them could be considered all-time classics, they were among the best.

Alfred Hitchcock is one of the very few who arguably has MORE than five titles that could be considered all-time greats. He has TEN! The 39 Steps, The Lady Vanishes, Shadow of a Doubt, Notorious, Strangers on a Train, Rear Window, Vertigo, North by Northwest, Psycho, and The Birds make up a helluva rare resume. And I bet there are readers here who would nominate Rebecca, Rope, The Man Who Knew Too Much (either version), The Wrong Man etc to go on that list.

So at a certain point, naming your personal favorite Hitchcock is like…